College Policy Debate Forums
September 25, 2018, 02:50:17 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: IF YOU EXPERIENCE PROBLEMS WITH THE SITE, INCLUDING LOGGING IN, PLEASE LET ME KNOW IMMEDIATELY.  EMAIL ME DIRECTLY OR USE THE CONTACT US LINK AT THE TOP.
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Scouting "Rules"  (Read 2865 times)
lacyjp
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 50


« on: October 19, 2009, 06:57:17 PM »

Not really "rules," but proposed norms:

1. "Priority to Public." Priority goes to scouts who will share
information publicly. Right now, that means posting stuff on the wiki.
Scouts need to eliminate their assumption that "because someone is
gathering cites, it will be shared." Often, there are people who gather
cites or read evidence for their own purposes after a debate. This is
fine, but the time it takes them to read & type cites trades off with
those ready to do so for public consumption. The needs of the community
far outweigh their concerns. As everyone is aware, there are certain
power dynamics involved in cite gathering. Everyone should be aware of
those dynamics & make sure that scouting for "squad only" or private
purposes is a much lower priority. If a scout who won't agree to share
is monopolizing pages, try to figure out how to share with them or alert
a debate judge. Most judges will be willing to say that a scout who will
share has priority.

2. "Scouts Honor." Don't say you'll share when you won't. Scouts have an
obligation to get their stuff posted publicly as soon as they can. After
all, its a shared resource. If there are several people waiting on the
info you are gathering, obviously you should post it the moment you
gather it. Just sign up for the wiki & edit it. If someone is a bit slow
getting your cites posted, cut them some slack. They probably lost the
cites or forgot.

3. Debaters. Many of you want to share your cites, exchange email
addresses, then forget to. This is normal. We need to get better at
combating it. If someone emails you for cites, put them on the wiki
instead. It takes just as much time as email. If you don't like posting
to the wiki, then email your stuff to me & I'll take care of posting it
when I have time. If you get cites from someone, put them on the wiki.
If you make an argument that someone finds "cite gathering worthy," then
try to help them save time by using your own electronic files.

4. Other Protocol Issues. If a debater says "you can have our cites if
you put it on the wiki," you should do so. Its called a deal. Maybe a
contract. I've heard of some disagreements about this that could have
been avoided if the people who agreed to post publicly would have
followed through. Just do it right away or email your stuff to me & I'll
get it posted...(No guarantee that I'll get it done fast enough to
satisfy others.)

What is the reason for all of this?

Because "closed" scouting is worse for debate than open scouting. Closed
scouting benefits the resource rich. Open scouting can make every debate
better.

How do I sign up for "the wiki?"

Easy. Go to opencaselist.wikispaces.com & click the "join" link in the
upper right hand corner.

-- JP
lacyjp@wfu.edu
Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.0.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
SMF customization services by 2by2host.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!