College Policy Debate Forums
November 20, 2017, 10:23:29 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: IF YOU EXPERIENCE PROBLEMS WITH THE SITE, INCLUDING LOGGING IN, PLEASE LET ME KNOW IMMEDIATELY.  EMAIL ME DIRECTLY OR USE THE CONTACT US LINK AT THE TOP.
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register CEDA caselist Debate Results Council of Tournament Directors Edebate Archive  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Research work for Monday, Day 3  (Read 2016 times)
paulmabrey
Full Member
***
Posts: 162


« on: June 02, 2013, 09:33:34 PM »

Attached is some work on the potential for "oversight" as floor mechanism. Seems to work.

* Day 3 - Oversight cards.docx (106.85 KB - downloaded 861 times.)
Logged
Dinger
Newbie
*
Posts: 19


« Reply #1 on: June 02, 2013, 10:02:32 PM »

Also worked on "oversight". **Spoiler alert** I come to a different conclusion than Paul but not for evidence reasons (his cards are sweet) but given the actually definitions and examples "oversight", it would allow small affs and seems to contradict the "statutory" in the resolution.


* Oversight.docx (28.94 KB - downloaded 309 times.)
Logged
Adam Symonds
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 349


« Reply #2 on: June 03, 2013, 01:17:00 AM »

Oversight work attached.

* Oversight vetting.docx (44.93 KB - downloaded 812 times.)
Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
SMF customization services by 2by2host.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!