College Policy Debate Forums
December 18, 2018, 04:04:35 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: IF YOU EXPERIENCE PROBLEMS WITH THE SITE, INCLUDING LOGGING IN, PLEASE LET ME KNOW IMMEDIATELY.  EMAIL ME DIRECTLY OR USE THE CONTACT US LINK AT THE TOP.
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: 2018-2019 Resolution Options  (Read 5458 times)
ceda
Administrator
Full Member
*****
Posts: 134


« on: June 14, 2018, 08:46:56 AM »

The topic committee has released the following slate of potential resolutions.
A link for voting will be released later in June.
The winning resolution will be announced on Friday, July 20, 2018.


Option 1 All or Nearly All: Nukes, Regulatory Review, Trade, Treaties, Immigration Removal, Deference, Officer Removal, Surveillance, War powers
Resolved: The United States Federal Government should statutorily and/or judicially restrict all or nearly all of the executive power of the President of the United States in one or more of the following areas:
   authority to conduct first-use nuclear strikes;
   centralized regulatory review;
   congressionally delegated trade power;
   exit from congressional-executive agreements and Article II treaties;
   immigration authority to conduct expedited removal;
   judicial deference to federal administrative agency interpretations of statutes and/or regulations;
   presidential removal power;
   the bulk incidental collection of all or nearly all foreign intelligence information on United States persons without a warrant;
   war powers authority to introduce United States Armed Forces into hostilities.

Option 2 Nukes, Regulatory Review, Trade, Immigration Removal, Deference
Resolved: The United States Federal Government should substantially increase statutory and/or judicial restrictions on the executive power of the President of the United States in one of more of the following areas:
   authority to conduct first-use nuclear strikes;
   centralized regulatory review;
   congressionally delegated trade power;
   immigration authority to conduct expedited removal;
   judicial deference to all or nearly all federal administrative agency interpretations of statutes and/or regulations.


Option 3 Nukes, Trade, Treaties, Immigration Removal, Deference
Resolved: The United States Federal Government should substantially increase statutory and/or judicial restrictions on the executive power of the President of the United States in one or more of the following areas:
   authority to conduct first-use nuclear strikes;
   congressionally delegated trade power;
   exit from congressional-executive agreements and Article II treaties;
   immigration authority to conduct expedited removal;
   judicial deference to all or nearly all federal administrative agency interpretations of statutes and/or regulations.

Option 4 Nukes, Trade, Treaties, Deference, Surveillance
Resolved: The United States Federal Government should substantially increase statutory and/or judicial restrictions on the executive power of the President of the United States in one or more of the following areas:
   authority to conduct first-use nuclear strikes;
   congressionally delegated trade power;
   exit from congressional-executive agreements and Article II treaties;
   judicial deference to all or nearly all federal administrative agency interpretations of statutes and/or regulations;
   the bulk incidental collection of all or nearly all foreign intelligence information on United States persons without a warrant.

Option 5 All or Nearly All: Trade, Treaties, Immigration Detention & Removal, Deference, Officer Appointment & Removal, War powers
Resolved: The United States Federal Government should statutorily and/or judicially restrict all or nearly all of the executive power of the President of the United States in one or more of the following areas:
   congressionally delegated trade power;
   exit from congressional-executive agreements and Article II treaties;
   immigration authority to detain and/or conduct expedited removal;
   judicial deference to all or nearly all federal administrative agency interpretations of statutes and/or regulations;
   presidential appointment and/or removal power;
   war powers authority to introduce United States Armed Forces into hostilities.

Option 6 Nukes, Trade, Treaties, Deference, Officer Removal
Resolved: The United States Federal Government should substantially increase statutory and/or judicial restrictions on the executive power of the President of the United States in one of more of the following areas:
   authority to conduct first-use nuclear strikes;
   congressionally delegated trade power;
   exit from congressional-executive agreements and Article II treaties;
   judicial deference to all or nearly all federal administrative agency interpretations of statutes and/or regulations;
   presidential removal power.


Option 7 Regulatory Review, Trade, Treaties, Deference, Officer Removal
Resolved: The United States Federal Government should substantially increase statutory and/or judicial restrictions on the executive power of the President of the United States in one of more of the following areas:
   centralized regulatory review;
   congressionally delegated trade power;
   exit from congressional-executive agreements and Article II treaties;
   judicial deference to all or nearly all federal administrative agency interpretations of statutes and/or regulations;
   presidential removal power.

Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!