Home

Cross Examination Debate Association

  • Login
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Journal
Home

CAD: 1984

Submitted by ceda on Thu, 2008-06-26 22:23
  • Journal

1984: Volume 5

Front matter

Ulrich, The nature of the topic in value debate

Gross, A case for debating propositions in policy

Jones & Crawford, Justification of values in terms of action: rationale for a modified policy-making paradigm in value debate

Dixon & Leslie, Propositional analysis: a need for focus in CEDA debate

Young & Gaske, On prima facie value argumentation: the policy implications affirmative

Cirlin, On negative strategy in value debate

Gotcher & Biggers, An alternative approach to negative speaker duties in CEDA debate

Simon, The case against counterwarrants in value proposition debates

Berube, Debating hasty generalization

Dempsey, Theoretical illegitimacy of speculative value objections

Miller & McVay, An audience analysis curriculum: its theory, practice and implications

Allen & Dowdy, An analysis of CEDA and NDT judging philosophies

Biggers & Gotcher, On consideration of judging in CEDA debate tournaments--a modest proposal

Brydon, Judging CEDA debate: a systems perspective

Hallmark, Towards a paradigm for CEDA

Brownlee, A projection of CEDA's near future