Home

Cross Examination Debate Association

  • Login
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Journal
Home

CAD: 1989

Submitted by ceda on Thu, 2008-06-26 22:19
  • Journal

1989: Volume 10

Front matter

Brownlee & Croassman, Advocacy, values and cost/benefit analysis

Dudczak, Topicality: an equal ground standard

Hill, Toward a holistic model of presumption for non-policy debate

Baker & Loge, Context exploration: paradigmatic variance beyond current uses of criteria

Berube, Hasty generalization revisited, part one: on being representative examples

Leeman & Hamlett, Calling a counter-warrant a counter-warrant: an immodest proposal

Brey, A descriptive analysis of CEDA judging philosophies Part I: definitive acceptance or rejection of certain tactics and arguments